Executive Alignment
Participants: Executives, sponsor, operations, planning, IT/OT, cybersecurity, finance
Outputs: Strategic drivers, business outcomes, scope, sponsorship, success criteria, and governance direction.
TwinGrid workshops create a controlled decision process before architecture, procurement, vendor selection, implementation, validation, cybersecurity approval, user adoption, and sustainment.
The workshop service guides utilities from executive alignment and problem discovery through architecture, sourcing, RFP preparation, validation, cybersecurity approval, adoption, and sustainment.
The sequence avoids technology-first scope definition and makes every requirement traceable to a problem, use case, data dependency, system dependency, or acceptance criterion.
Participants: Executives, sponsor, operations, planning, IT/OT, cybersecurity, finance
Outputs: Strategic drivers, business outcomes, scope, sponsorship, success criteria, and governance direction.
Participants: Operators, planners, outage managers, protection engineers, asset managers
Outputs: Problem register, pain-point map, operational priorities, planning priorities, asset and model issues.
Participants: Business owners, technical leads, user representatives, finance
Outputs: Use-case catalogue, scoring matrix, phase-one candidates, dependency map, initial benefit hypothesis.
Participants: GIS, ADMS, EMS, OMS, SCADA, AMI, planning, asset, data, IT
Outputs: Data inventory, model inventory, source-of-truth map, data quality gap register, model quality gap register.
Participants: IT, OT, enterprise architecture, cybersecurity, vendors, system owners
Outputs: Logical architecture, integration map, interface requirements, cybersecurity zones, architecture decision log.
Participants: Executives, procurement, architecture, finance, business owners
Outputs: Implementation roadmap, phase-one scope, buy-build-integrate matrix, procurement strategy.
Participants: Procurement, legal, IT, OT, cybersecurity, business owners
Outputs: RFP requirements, vendor response templates, evaluation matrix, demonstration scenarios, acceptance criteria.
Participants: PMO, vendor, business owners, technical leads, workstream leads
Outputs: Program charter, RACI, workstream structure, risk and issue process, change control, reporting cadence.
Participants: Cybersecurity, engineering, operations, testing teams, vendor, compliance
Outputs: Validation plan, cybersecurity approval plan, test plan, go-live criteria, sign-off matrix.
Participants: End users, training, support, IT/OT, business owners, super users
Outputs: Training plan, operating model, support model, sustainment roadmap, ownership model, benefits tracking plan.
3–4 weeks. Best for early strategy, business case development, readiness scans, or pre-RFP planning when internal alignment is already strong.
6–8 weeks. Best for most utilities preparing a structured digital twin program, architecture direction, and procurement package.
10–12 weeks. Best for large utilities with complex IT/OT environments, multiple business units, major procurement, and enterprise architecture scope.
Executive problem statement, business objectives, success criteria, problem register, pain-point map, use-case catalogue, value map.
Data inventory, model inventory, source-of-truth map, data quality gaps, target logical architecture, integration map, cybersecurity zones.
Implementation roadmap, buy-build-integrate matrix, procurement strategy, RFP requirements, response templates, vendor evaluation matrix.
Program charter, RACI, workstream model, validation plan, cybersecurity approval plan, go-live criteria, training, support, operating model, sustainment roadmap.